Ege Kurter
University of South Carolina
| Subject Areas: | Natural hazards |
Recent Activity
ABSTRACT:
We present a homogeneous and spatially explicit dataset at county and tract levels that supports climate change risk assessment across the contiguous United States, designed to enable user-defined construction of hazard, exposure, vulnerability, resilience, and composite risk indices through application-specific weighting of variables and selection of hazards or future hazard projections. The dataset follows the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) risk framework, which defines risk through four key components: hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. It includes 130 variables compiled from multiple national sources for 3,198 counties and 83,481 tracts. Major data sources include the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) from the University of South Carolina, the National Risk Index (NRI) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Additional datasets were integrated to provide a more comprehensive set of exposure variables. To facilitate integration of variables with different units and scales, all data were winsorized at the 5th and 95th percentiles and normalized using fuzzy membership functions. The resulting normalized values represent relative positions within the distribution of each indicator and provide a consistent numerical framework for visualization, spatial analysis, and user-defined risk modeling. This process reduces the influence of outliers while preserving data variability. The resulting dataset provides a consistent foundation for constructing composite risk indices, replicating or extending IPCC AR6-aligned analyses, and supporting climate risk and adaptation research. It is particularly suited for applications in systemic risk assessment, spatial modeling, and policy evaluation.
ABSTRACT:
Overtopping failures of earthen dams are a growing concern under intensifying extreme rainfall. This study introduces a probabilistic fragility framework that combines hydrologic modeling, hydraulic analysis, and soil erodibility to assess erosion risk under uncertain load and resistance. Fragility curves derived from Monte Carlo simulations quantify erosion initiation and severity as functions of rainfall depth and excess shear stress. Application to multiple dams affected during the 2015 South Carolina floods reproduces observed outcomes ranging from complete breach to no damage. The framework also captures cascading effects, where failure of an upstream structure increases downstream loading and erosion potential. Compared with deterministic approaches, the method better represents outcome variability and provides a more reliable basis for dam safety assessment and flood risk mitigation.
Contact
| (Log in to send email) |
| All | 0 |
| Collection | 0 |
| Resource | 0 |
| App Connector | 0 |
Created: April 21, 2025, 4:30 p.m.
Authors: Kurter, Ege C. · Nemnem, Ayman
ABSTRACT:
Overtopping failures of earthen dams are a growing concern under intensifying extreme rainfall. This study introduces a probabilistic fragility framework that combines hydrologic modeling, hydraulic analysis, and soil erodibility to assess erosion risk under uncertain load and resistance. Fragility curves derived from Monte Carlo simulations quantify erosion initiation and severity as functions of rainfall depth and excess shear stress. Application to multiple dams affected during the 2015 South Carolina floods reproduces observed outcomes ranging from complete breach to no damage. The framework also captures cascading effects, where failure of an upstream structure increases downstream loading and erosion potential. Compared with deterministic approaches, the method better represents outcome variability and provides a more reliable basis for dam safety assessment and flood risk mitigation.
Created: Oct. 14, 2025, 6:57 p.m.
Authors: Hatami Goloujeh, Mehdi · Kurter, Ege
ABSTRACT:
We present a homogeneous and spatially explicit dataset at county and tract levels that supports climate change risk assessment across the contiguous United States, designed to enable user-defined construction of hazard, exposure, vulnerability, resilience, and composite risk indices through application-specific weighting of variables and selection of hazards or future hazard projections. The dataset follows the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) risk framework, which defines risk through four key components: hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and resilience. It includes 130 variables compiled from multiple national sources for 3,198 counties and 83,481 tracts. Major data sources include the Baseline Resilience Indicators for Communities (BRIC) from the University of South Carolina, the National Risk Index (NRI) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Additional datasets were integrated to provide a more comprehensive set of exposure variables. To facilitate integration of variables with different units and scales, all data were winsorized at the 5th and 95th percentiles and normalized using fuzzy membership functions. The resulting normalized values represent relative positions within the distribution of each indicator and provide a consistent numerical framework for visualization, spatial analysis, and user-defined risk modeling. This process reduces the influence of outliers while preserving data variability. The resulting dataset provides a consistent foundation for constructing composite risk indices, replicating or extending IPCC AR6-aligned analyses, and supporting climate risk and adaptation research. It is particularly suited for applications in systemic risk assessment, spatial modeling, and policy evaluation.